Sorry, got cut off in mid message<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Henry Minsky <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hminsky@laszlosystems.com">hminsky@laszlosystems.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">I was looking at declaring types for global named views, and it occurred to me that we could do this for local names as well,<div>
e.g.,</div><div><br></div><div><view></div><div> <view name="baz" onclick="bar.dosomething()"/></div>
<div> <view name="bar"></div><div> <method name="dosomething"> ... </method></div></blockquote><div> </view></div><div> </view></div><div><br></div><div>
So in this case, the "bar" and "baz" views actually get custom anonymous classes created</div><div>for them , and it would improve compile time error checking if the vars "baz" and "bar" were</div>
<div>declared with type being the actual class they will be bound to. </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div></div>
<div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Henry Minsky<br>Software Architect<br><a href="mailto:hminsky@laszlosystems.com" target="_blank">hminsky@laszlosystems.com</a><br>
<br><br>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Henry Minsky<br>Software Architect<br><a href="mailto:hminsky@laszlosystems.com">hminsky@laszlosystems.com</a><br><br><br>