[Laszlo-dev] [Laszlo-reviews] For Review: Change, 20091120-hqm-i Summary: support mixins on instances

[Henry Minsky]

I didn't like 'anonymous' at all. I was thinking of 'instance-class' but
that's pretty un-informative too.



On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:03 PM, P T Withington <ptw at pobox.com> wrote:

> Good point.
>
> Back to anonymous?
>
> Is there a better term?
>
> On 2009-11-20, at 17:07, André Bargull wrote:
>
> > I disagree about this point:
> > I wouldn't call it a `singleton`, because in case of replication the
> "instance class" might have multiple instances and therefore isn't a
> singleton.
> >
> >
> >> [laszlo-reviews -> laszlo-dev]
> >>
> >> I'll try to look at this in just a bit, but I had a thought:
> >>
> >> I wonder if instead of `anonymous` we should use `singleton`, I think
> that might be more descriptive/accurate.  An "instance class" as we have
> been calling it is really an instance of a singleton class, a class that
> will only ever have this one instance as a member, so we don't give it a tag
> name (which is why we think of it as anonymous).
>
>


-- 
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
hminsky at laszlosystems.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.openlaszlo.org/pipermail/laszlo-dev/attachments/20091120/603ed13a/attachment.html