[Laszlo-dev] [Laszlo-reviews] For Review: Change, 20091120-hqm-i Summary: support mixins on instances

[P T Withington]

Good point.

Back to anonymous?

Is there a better term?

On 2009-11-20, at 17:07, André Bargull wrote:

> I disagree about this point:
> I wouldn't call it a `singleton`, because in case of replication the "instance class" might have multiple instances and therefore isn't a singleton.
> 
> 
>> [laszlo-reviews -> laszlo-dev]
>> 
>> I'll try to look at this in just a bit, but I had a thought:
>> 
>> I wonder if instead of `anonymous` we should use `singleton`, I think that might be more descriptive/accurate.  An "instance class" as we have been calling it is really an instance of a singleton class, a class that will only ever have this one instance as a member, so we don't give it a tag name (which is why we think of it as anonymous).