[Laszlo-dev] [Laszlo-reviews] For Review: Change, 20091120-hqm-i Summary: support mixins on instances

[André Bargull]

I disagree about this point:
I wouldn't call it a `singleton`, because in case of replication the 
"instance class" might have multiple instances and therefore isn't a 
singleton.


> [laszlo-reviews -> laszlo-dev]
>
> I'll try to look at this in just a bit, but I had a thought:
>
> I wonder if instead of `anonymous` we should use `singleton`, I think that might be more descriptive/accurate.  An "instance class" as we have been calling it is really an instance of a singleton class, a class that will only ever have this one instance as a member, so we don't give it a tag name (which is why we think of it as anonymous).