[Laszlo-dev] lz['tagname']

[P T Withington]

Oh, right.  I _knew_ there was something...  Never mind!

On 2009-11-12, at 16:46, Neil Mix wrote:

> Not valid *in that context*.  (e4x)
> 
> On Nov 12, 2009, at 3:43 PM, P T Withington wrote:
> 
>> On 2009-11-12, at 16:34, Rami Ojares / AMG wrote:
>> 
>>> Do you mean new <'view'>(...) ?
>>> 
>>> I am quite satisfied with new lz['view'](...)
>>> 
>>> Or do you mean new <view>(...)
>>> as in new lz.view(...)?
>> 
>> Yes.  I was thinking:
>> 
>> new <view>
>> 
>> might be more obvious.  And that it would be an extension, because <view> is not a valid Javascript symbol -- it would normally be an error.
>> 
>>> -rami
>>>> I wonder if we should extend our script compiler to let you say:
>>>> 
>>>> new <view>(...)
>>>> 
>>>> and if that would be any more obvious than:
>>>> 
>>>> new lz['view'](...)
>>>> 
>>>> ?
>>>> 
>>>> Is the <> syntax already used by some Javascript extension?
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>