[Laszlo-dev] lz['tagname']

[Neil Mix]

Not valid *in that context*.  (e4x)

On Nov 12, 2009, at 3:43 PM, P T Withington wrote:

> On 2009-11-12, at 16:34, Rami Ojares / AMG wrote:
>
>> Do you mean new <'view'>(...) ?
>>
>> I am quite satisfied with new lz['view'](...)
>>
>> Or do you mean new <view>(...)
>> as in new lz.view(...)?
>
> Yes.  I was thinking:
>
>  new <view>
>
> might be more obvious.  And that it would be an extension, because  
> <view> is not a valid Javascript symbol -- it would normally be an  
> error.
>
>> -rami
>>> I wonder if we should extend our script compiler to let you say:
>>>
>>> new <view>(...)
>>>
>>> and if that would be any more obvious than:
>>>
>>> new lz['view'](...)
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Is the <> syntax already used by some Javascript extension?
>>>
>>
>
>