[Laszlo-dev] lz['tagname']

[P T Withington]

On 2009-11-12, at 16:34, Rami Ojares / AMG wrote:

> Do you mean new <'view'>(...) ?
> 
> I am quite satisfied with new lz['view'](...)
> 
> Or do you mean new <view>(...)
> as in new lz.view(...)?

Yes.  I was thinking:

  new <view>

might be more obvious.  And that it would be an extension, because <view> is not a valid Javascript symbol -- it would normally be an error.

> -rami
>> I wonder if we should extend our script compiler to let you say:
>> 
>>  new <view>(...)
>> 
>> and if that would be any more obvious than:
>> 
>>  new lz['view'](...)
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> Is the <> syntax already used by some Javascript extension?
>>  
>