[Laszlo-dev] Close some stale JIRA-bugs?

[Amy Muntz]

Andre,
This is a great start!  Thank you!

If anyone out there is interested in reviewing them, please send an 
email.
:)
--- Amy


On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:32 PM , André Bargull wrote:

> I've written up some candidates at [1], so maybe someone can take a 
> look at those bugs.
>
>
> [1] http://wiki.openlaszlo.org/Jira_Cleanup
>
>
> On 8/15/2009 1:16 PM, Amy Muntz wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Yes - it would be extremely helpful if the community could help us 
>> clean up JIRA bugs. Anything we can do to pare the list will help us 
>> more easily identify the existing problems.
>>
>> As for the bugs assigned to folks who don't work on the project any 
>> longer, I will make a pass at those and set them to unassigned so 
>> that they can be reviewed.
>>
>> In terms of where to start, I think Unscheduled (1176 open) and 
>> Future (313 open) are both good places to start. I'm happy to do the 
>> JIRA work to close them out if folks either send comments like Andre 
>> did or comment the bug itself.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Amy
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 7:03 AM , Raju Bitter wrote:
>>
>>> Good idea, André, I agree there are many stale issues, and the 
>>> question is if Amy couldn't start a request to the community to do a 
>>> bug cleanup session.
>>>
>>> What will happen with all the bugs assigned to people who don't work 
>>> for the company any more, or don't work on the project any more?
>>>
>>> - Raju
>>>
>>> On Aug 15, 2009, at 1:45 AM, André Bargull wrote:
>>>
>>>> There are many stale entries in our JIRA which can be closed, for 
>>>> example these candidates:
>>>> 1) http://www.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-5465
>>>> 2) http://www.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-7080
>>>> 3) http://www.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-7143
>>>>
>>>> 1) "__LZapplyStyleMap" isn't used anymore, so why not close this 
>>>> bug?
>>>> 2) This is a "Won't Fix" or "Invalid", fiddling with the prototype 
>>>> of built-in objects is not supported (the "intercept mouse 
>>>> gesture"- idea can be filed as a separate entry, though)
>>>> 3) Hmm, that one is not a bug, it's how JavaScript works..
>>