[Laszlo-dev] For Review: Change 20090414-ptw-G Summary: Correct path computation to work for canvas

[André Bargull]

Hm, I wonder if it is at all necessary to distinguish 'normal' classes 
from anonymous classes. Actually average Joe shouldn't even know that in 
certain cases (methods, handlers, constraints, etc.) anonymous 
subclasses have been generated, should he?

On 4/14/2009 7:35 PM, P T Withington wrote:
> This is actually correct.  It is telling you that the class of the 
> canvas is not just canvas, but an anonymous subclass of canvas.  That's 
> why the class is <canvas>#1, instead of just <canvas>, it's because the 
> class is not lz.canvas, even though it identifies itself as a class 
> named 'canvas'.
> 
> If you don't have any methods on the canvas, so that it does not have to 
> make an anonymous subclass, you won't get the extra #.  The same will 
> happen with any class that has to create an anonymous subclass because 
> there are instance methods.
> 
> I'm open to better ideas on how to display these anonymous classes if 
> you have one.
> 
> On 2009-04-14, at 13:04EDT, André Bargull wrote:
> 
>> Approved for the classname change, but in the debugger the canvas is 
>> still displayed as:
>> «<canvas>#1#0| This is the canvas»
>> Instead of:
>> «<canvas>#0| This is the canvas»
>>