[Laszlo-dev] declaring types for named views/nodes

[P T Withington]

Seems like a good idea, assuming you can compute the information  
without having to add another pass to the compiler...

On 2009-04-06, at 14:54EDT, Henry Minsky wrote:

> Sorry, got cut off in mid message
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Henry Minsky <hminsky at laszlosystems.com 
> >wrote:
>
>> I was looking at declaring types for global named views, and it  
>> occurred to
>> me that we could do this for local names as well,e.g.,
>>
>> <view>
>>   <view name="baz" onclick="bar.dosomething()"/>
>>   <view name="bar">
>>         <method name="dosomething"> ... </method>
>>
>     </view>
>    </view>
>
> So in this case, the "bar" and "baz" views actually get custom  
> anonymous
> classes created
> for them , and it would improve compile time error checking if the  
> vars
> "baz" and "bar" were
> declared with  type being the actual class they will be bound to.
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Henry Minsky
>> Software Architect
>> hminsky at laszlosystems.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Henry Minsky
> Software Architect
> hminsky at laszlosystems.com