[Laszlo-dev] inspector checked into two places?

[Henry Minsky]

Hmm, I rewrote the tool that generates the autoincludes, and  I think there
was a conflict with some class that the inspector defines and some other
class that is autoincluded. I didn't realize that anyone expected the
inspector to be autoincluded, I thought it was just an artifact of the old
way we generated the autoincludes...



On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Sarah Allen <sarah at ultrasaurus.com> wrote:

> well they both seem to work although produce different warnings.  Perhaps
> the auto-include had made it break somehow.  Here's a mysterious unreviewed
> checkin by Henry.... perhaps there's a back story.
>
> Change 20090320-hqm-0 by hqm at badtzmaru.home on 2009-03-20 11:16:00 EDT
>    in /Users/hqm/openlaszlo/trunk7
>    for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
>
> Summary:  don't include object inspector classes in autoincludes
>
> New Features:
>
> Bugs Fixed:
>
> Technical Reviewer: hqm
> QA Reviewer: (pending)
> Doc Reviewer: (pending)
>
> Documentation:
>
> Release Notes:
>
> Details:
>
> + the autoincludes file should not be including the object inspector tool
> classes
>
>
> Tests
>
>
>
> On Apr 4, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Sarah Allen wrote:
>
>  appears to be:
>> /lps/components/utils/diagnostic/inspector/
>> and
>> /laszlo-explorer/inspector/
>>
>> why is it in laszlo-explorer?  I was going to see if I could fix it
>> (LPP-7846) since I find this to be a useful tool, but I'm concerned that the
>> code appears to be checked into two places...
>>
>> Sarah
>>
>
>


-- 
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
hminsky at laszlosystems.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.openlaszlo.org/pipermail/laszlo-dev/attachments/20090404/384a9aaa/attachment.html