[Laszlo-dev] [Laszlo-checkins] r8118 - openlaszlo/trunk/WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/sc
P T Withington
ptw at pobox.com
Thu Feb 28 10:03:08 PST 2008
On 2008-02-27, at 17:08 EST, dda at openlaszlo.org wrote:
> There is also a fix to the ParseTreePrinter so that it knows how
> to print
> 'cast'. This wasn't needed before to print final output from
> JS1, since
> casts were always removed. Casts are generated in the dependency
> source
> so they will work with SWF9 - without it, the flex compile
> complains
> about references to nonexistant dependency functions.
> Downcasting to
> Object makes the compiler *less* strict and accepting of any
> function name.
> The output from the simple dependency given above has been tested
> to
> compile with flex2 as a proof of concept.
FWIW, The flex compiler has the same loophole that we have in our swf
compiler to get around checking. To call a dynamic function or access
a dynamic value, instead of:
foo.bar()
you write:
foo['bar']()
In other words, using `[]` to access members instead of `.` turns off
the compiler optimization (which results in the compiler complaint).
Eventually we will want to tweak the generator to not use the cast or
`[]`, because these dependency functions _should_ all be known at
compile time.
More information about the Laszlo-dev
mailing list