[Laszlo-dev] [Laszlo-builds] SUCCESS for 10572-openlaszlo-trunk on linux-builder.corp.laszlosystems.com

[Mamye Kratt]

Like I said, fighting with the servers all of Friday distracted me.

Mamye

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "P T Withington" <ptw at pobox.com>
To: "Mamye Kratt" <mamye at laszlosystems.com>
Cc: "Amy Muntz" <amuntz at laszlosystems.com>; "OpenLaszlo Developers" 
<laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org>; "David Temkin" <temkin at laszlosystems.com>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Laszlo-dev] [Laszlo-builds] SUCCESS for 10572-openlaszlo-trunk 
on linux-builder.corp.laszlosystems.com


> I'd like to understand how this skew occurs and see if we can't  somehow 
> tweak the build process so it can't happen. If we can make it  so there is 
> only one place that the release name gets updated, this  shouldn't be able 
> to happen, right?
>
> On Aug 4, 2008, at 13:49, David Temkin <temkin at laszlosystems.com> wrote:
>
>> If you download and install the latest build (Mac installer), it  will 
>> not launch Laszlo Explorer because of a file name conflict.  It's 
>> installed under the name "4.2.x" but the launcher evidently  expects 
>> "4.2a".
>>
>> so... what's the ETA for 4.2a on the site (download page, etc)?
>>
>> - D.
>>
>>
>> On Aug 4, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Mamye Kratt wrote:
>>
>>> Between fighting with the build servers it got messed up. I vote 
>>> releases are on Tuesdays, Wednesdays or Thursdays in the future.
>>>
>>> Mamye
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "P T Withington" <ptw at pobox.com>
>>> To: "Mamye Kratt" <mamye at laszlosystems.com>
>>> Cc: "Amy Muntz" <amuntz at laszlosystems.com>; "Mark Davis" 
>>> <mdavis at laszlosystems.com
>>> >; "OpenLaszlo Developers" <laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org>
>>> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 12:15 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Laszlo-builds] SUCCESS for 10572-openlaszlo-trunk on 
>>> linux-builder.corp.laszlosystems.com
>>>
>>>
>>>> Eh?  How did that happen?
>>>>
>>>> I think the lesson to be learned here is:  don't try to make a  release 
>>>> without making a branch. Making a branch is a much simpler  and more 
>>>> reliable way to freeze your source than sending email  asking for 
>>>> people not to check in...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 4, 2008, at 14:06, "Mamye Kratt" <mamye at laszlosystems.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Not really, still no checkins. The number in the build script got 
>>>>> changed to 4.2.x over the weekend.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mamye
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "P T Withington" <ptw at pobox.com>
>>>>> To: "Amy Muntz" <amuntz at laszlosystems.com>; "Mamye Kratt" 
>>>>> <mamye at laszlosystems.com
>>>>> >; "Mark Davis" <mdavis at laszlosystems.com>
>>>>> Cc: "OpenLaszlo Developers" <laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org>
>>>>> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 12:00 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Laszlo-builds] SUCCESS for 10572-openlaszlo-trunk  on 
>>>>> linux-builder.corp.laszlosystems.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> HURRAY!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 4, 2008, at 12:52, svnbuild at laszlosystems.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2008-08-04 09:52:49 PDT: SUCCESS for 10572-openlaszlo-trunk  with 
>>>>>>> build return code 0 on linux- builder.corp.laszlosystems.com 
>>>>>>> (Deploy return code 0; Megatest  succeeded, 0) attaching /home/ 
>>>>>>> svnbuild/logs/ tail-10572-trunk- nightly.log
>>>>>>> <tail-10572-trunk-nightly.log>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Laszlo-builds mailing list
>>>>>>> Laszlo-builds at openlaszlo.org
>>>>>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-builds
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>