[Laszlo-dev] how we're gonna track 3.4 vs 4.1 doc mismatches

[John Sundman]

Does this bug pertain to information from the old "wrappers" that did  
not get ported, or only to the automagically generated fields?

(By "wrapper" info, I mean the pararaph(s), sometimes containing  
example(s), that appears at the top of each reference page.)

jrs

On Oct 31, 2007, at 6:21 PM, Benjamin Shine wrote:

>
> Tucker and I discussed this and came to the conclusion that we  
> should have a single giant bug to track tons of 3.4 vs 4.1 doc  
> mismatches. They will almost all end up needing to be reviewed by  
> the API quorum anyways, and that is better done en masse than  
> individually.
>
> LPP-5011 Reference Incosistencies between 3.4 Reference and 4.1  
> Reference for the LFC
> is our new friend. Append additional inconsistencies here.
>
> When we get up to paying attention to things-beyond-the-LFC then we  
> might want to make separate bugs for "all things components" and  
> "all things data". For now let's just focus on the LFC.
>
> -ben