[Laszlo-dev] process question: qa reviewer?

[Elliot Winard]

I'd think that tests should be added to test-plans for many fixes.

Isn't the QA reviewer so we make sure that we catch regressions in the 
future?
-e


On Mon, Oct 8, 2007 at  2:18 PM, Benjamin Shine wrote:

> In our review packages, we list a QA reviewer. For a while, we left it 
> blank, or just set everything to mamye. These days, we're mostly 
> setting other developers as QA reviewer.
>
> What do we want the purpose of the QA reviewer field to be?
>
> -ben