[Laszlo-dev] For Review: Change 39847 Summary: Parse `a in b`
Max Carlson
max at laszlosystems.com
Tue Mar 21 16:19:16 EST 2006
Since we decided to pass kernels through as-is, do we need this partial
change? Approved [ as an interim step to full swf support - may want to
hold until there's full swf support]
-Max
P T Withington wrote:
> Note this does not implement the in operator in SWF (yet), just lets it
> pass through to DHTML. So you should only use it in the kernel, not in
> generic code.
>
> Waiting for my reviewers to approve...
>
> On 2006-03-21 13:54 EST, Adam Wolff wrote:
>
>> go tucker!
>>
>> On Mar 21, P T Withington wrote:
>>
>>> Change 39847 by ptw at ptw-legals-2 on 2006/02/28 12:47:39 *pending*
>>>
>>> Summary: Parse `a in b`
>>> Bugs Fixed:
>>> LPP-969 "Implement 'in' operator" (partial)
>>> Technical Reviewer: hminsky (pending)
>>> QA Reviewer: max (pending)
>>> Doc Reviewer: n/a (pending)
>>> Details: Use a hack to avoid duplicating every production just
>>> so you can disambiguate `for (... in` from `... in ...`. This
>>> is sufficient for the Javascript translator. The SWF backend
>>> still needs to be taught to translate the `in` operator.
>>> Tests: ./buildlfc no longer barfs on use of `in` in
>>> lzdataset.js
>>>
>>> Affected files ...
>>>
>>> ...
>>> //depot/lps-legals/WEB-INF/lps/server/sc/src/org/openlaszlo/sc/Parser.jjt#2
>>>
>>> edit
>>>
>>>
>
>
--
Regards,
Max Carlson
OpenLaszlo.org
More information about the Laszlo-dev
mailing list