[Laszlo-dev] For Review: Change 38015 - add Debug.write(),
animation stress test to LEGALS
Elliot Winard
enw at laszlosystems.com
Mon Jan 30 13:39:03 PST 2006
I'd be happy to do this if it's the best use of my limited legals time.
Debug.addText() isn't in the docs. I use Debug.write() often and kept
scratching my head trying to remember if I should print() write() trace() or
what in DHTML targetland.
Maybe I'll talk to Max about plugging this in in the right place.
-e
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, P T Withington wrote:
> Note that the debugger output has a number of layers. Rather than redefining
> Debug.write, you should be able to take nearly much more of the LFC debugger
> (which should be pretty pure javascript) and just redefine Debug.addText
> (which is where are the output from Debug.write, etc. ends up going).
> Debug.addText starts out in the core by just logging any output. When the gui
> debugger gets loaded, it re-defines Debug.addText to send output to the gui
> window and replays all the logged output. If you have an output capability
> early on, Debug.addText is where you want to hook in.
>
> Actually, I'd love to work on getting the debugger working for DHTML, if I
> didn't have other stuff higher on my queue -- so if you want to play with
> that, feel free to ask me questions.
>
> On 30 Jan 2006, at 13:33, Elliot Winard wrote:
>
> > I'm having trouble getting the p4 scripts to work in cygwin. I cobbled this
> > one together by hand. :|
> >
> > I just started working in the Legals code. The debugger currently
> > implemented
> > in Legals is a different API than the debugger in other targets. This
> > brings
> > them a bit closer together.
> >
> > The file is currently in the test folder. It probably will eventually go
> > into
> > the main lps folder.
> >
> > So, this *is* adding user-visible functionality by enabling existing
> > functionality in legals. I filed bug to do this officially -
> > http://www.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-1456
> >
> > -e
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, John Sundman wrote:
> >
> > > Do you need a doc reviewer? (There's no slot in your checkin format.
> > > (What
> > > am I, chopped liver (*sniff, sniff*)?)
> > >
> > > It's no clear to me if this is adding user-visible functionality or just
> > > enabling existing functionality in legals. Please clarify?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > jrs
> > >
> > > On Jan 30, 2006, at 12:28 AM, Elliot Winard wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Change:38015
> > > > Dev reviewer:Max? Jim? Como?
> > > > User:ewinard
> > > > Status:pending
> > > > Description:
> > > > * initial checkin of Debug.lzx so developers can use
> > > > Debug.write()
> > > > to dump stuff to the debugger, making DHTML code instantly more
> > > > portable.
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Laszlo-dev mailing list
> > Laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org
> > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
>
More information about the Laszlo-dev
mailing list