[Laszlo-dev] Re: For Review: Change 36864 Summary:Modify schema to consolidate node-specific element definitions and reuse them within definition of both node and view.

[John Sundman]

What Tucker said.

(And thanks, Tucker, for watching my back.)

  I hope we've learned that "ant doc", or at the very least "ant 
reference'  (in docs/src) should be part of every pre-checkin test.

jrs

On Jan 9, 2006, at 7:01 PM, P T Withington wrote:

> Two comments/questions:
>
> Why do I want to declare a dataset in a node?
>
> This will have doc impact, because of the hairy way the doc for the 
> LFC is generated from the shema, so you should test that the doc still 
> builds, and probably advise the doc guy about the change (you should 
> review node and view's doc pages to make sure they still make sense).
>
> Approved if the doc builds sensibly.
>
> On 9 Jan 2006, at 18:30, Jim Grandy wrote:
>
>> Change 36864 by jgrandy at jgrandy-dev on 2006/01/09 15:26:16 *pending*
>>
>> 	Summary:Modify schema to consolidate node-specific element 
>> definitions and reuse them within definition of both node and view.
>> 	
>> 	Bugs Fixed: LPP-1148
>> 	
>> 	Technical Reviewer: ptw (pending)
>> 	QA Reviewer: mdavis (pending)
>> 	Doc Reviewer: n/a
>> 	
>> 	Details:Node and view were both deriving elements in part from 
>> ObjectElements. Since view's capabilities should be a superset of 
>> node's, it makes sense to define a NodeElements and use it in the 
>> element definitions of both node and view. Arguably we should do this 
>> with the other classes derived from node, but that will have to wait 
>> for a more general revamping of the schema.
>> 	
>> 	Tests:Smokecheck, Laszlo Explorer
>>
>> Affected files ...
>>
>> ... //depot/lps-dev/WEB-INF/lps/schema/lzx.rnc#29 edit
>>
>>
>> <changeset-36864.zip>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Laszlo-dev mailing list
> Laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org
> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev