[Laszlo-dev] Re: For Review: Change 36864 Summary:Modify schema
to consolidate node-specific element definitions and reuse them
within definition of both node and view.
jsundman at laszlosystems.com
Mon Jan 9 16:22:49 PST 2006
What Tucker said.
(And thanks, Tucker, for watching my back.)
I hope we've learned that "ant doc", or at the very least "ant
reference' (in docs/src) should be part of every pre-checkin test.
On Jan 9, 2006, at 7:01 PM, P T Withington wrote:
> Two comments/questions:
> Why do I want to declare a dataset in a node?
> This will have doc impact, because of the hairy way the doc for the
> LFC is generated from the shema, so you should test that the doc still
> builds, and probably advise the doc guy about the change (you should
> review node and view's doc pages to make sure they still make sense).
> Approved if the doc builds sensibly.
> On 9 Jan 2006, at 18:30, Jim Grandy wrote:
>> Change 36864 by jgrandy at jgrandy-dev on 2006/01/09 15:26:16 *pending*
>> Summary:Modify schema to consolidate node-specific element
>> definitions and reuse them within definition of both node and view.
>> Bugs Fixed: LPP-1148
>> Technical Reviewer: ptw (pending)
>> QA Reviewer: mdavis (pending)
>> Doc Reviewer: n/a
>> Details:Node and view were both deriving elements in part from
>> ObjectElements. Since view's capabilities should be a superset of
>> node's, it makes sense to define a NodeElements and use it in the
>> element definitions of both node and view. Arguably we should do this
>> with the other classes derived from node, but that will have to wait
>> for a more general revamping of the schema.
>> Tests:Smokecheck, Laszlo Explorer
>> Affected files ...
>> ... //depot/lps-dev/WEB-INF/lps/schema/lzx.rnc#29 edit
> Laszlo-dev mailing list
> Laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org
More information about the Laszlo-dev