[Laszlo-dev] For Review: Change 41721 Summary: More debugger reorg

[Henry Minsky]

The call to the validator is done just once, a call to Parser.validate in
Compiler.compile. It is called just once on the entire app document after
all <include>'s have been expanded, I believe.



On 4/23/06, P T Withington <ptw at openlaszlo.org> wrote:
>
> I think it is something more obscure.  The switch certainly looks
> like it will not process the library, yet we get all sorts of
> warnings about things in the library.  Oh!  Maybe when the switch
> asks the xml parser to get the children, it tries to greedily parse
> the library, even though it will be ignored, and it barfs because
> none of the auto-included libraries are in the schema yet.
>
> Is there some way to ask the xml parser to give me a child node
> without it validating the contents of that node?
>
> On 2006-04-23, at 19:14 EDT, Henry Minsky wrote:
>
> > Some sort of autoinclude failure maybe?
> >
> > On 4/23/06, P T Withington <ptw at openlaszlo.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2006-04-23, at 14:55 EDT, P T Withington wrote:
> >>
> >>>       components/debugger/library: use <switch> tag to not include
> >>>       component debugger for DHTML.
> >>
> >> This doesn't actually work.  I was wondering if you (Henry) had any
> >> insight.
> >>
> >> When I write the switch thusly:
> >>
> >> <library>
> >>    <switch>
> >>      <when runtime="dhtml">
> >>      </when>
> >>      <otherwise>
> >>        <include href="debugger.lzx"/>
> >>      </otherwise>
> >>    </switch>
> >> </library>
> >>
> >> The compiler issues all sorts of complaints
> >>
> >>> 21 compilation warnings:
> >>>
> >>> debugger/debugger.lzx:74:31: element "resizelayout" not allowed in
> >>> this context. Check whether it is spelled correctly, and whether a
> >>> class with this name exists.
> >>> debugger/debugger.lzx:87:36: element "stableborderlayout" not
> >>> allowed in this context. Check whether it is spelled correctly, and
> >>> whether a class with this name exists.
> >>> debugger/debugger.lzx:460:30: element "dragstate" not allowed in
> >>> this context. Check whether it is spelled correctly, and whether a
> >>> class with this name exists.
> >>
> >> (&c.)
> >>
> >> I suspect there is something going on where the parser is parsing the
> >> debugger file before the switch can decide not to compile it.
> >> Perhaps the switch 'compilation' needs to actually happen at parse
> >> time.
> >>
> >> The question remains whether we want or need to support this... it is
> >> a primitive requires/provides, so seemed like a logical place to
> >> start.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Laszlo-dev mailing list
> >> Laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org
> >> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Henry Minsky
> > Software Architect
> > hminsky at laszlosystems.com
>
>


--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
hminsky at laszlosystems.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.openlaszlo.org/pipermail/laszlo-dev/attachments/20060424/117e1db0/attachment.html