[Laszlo-dev] Re: For Review: Change 35233 Summary:Add a few unit tests for LzNode.

[P T Withington]

On 29 Nov 2005, at 15:45, Jim Grandy wrote:

> On Nov 29, 2005, at 12:33 PM, P T Withington wrote:
>> It's not clear to me that LzNode.subnodes is guaranteed to be in  
>> any particular order, but in lzunit-node.lzx you are testing that.
>>
> Really? Shouldn't lexical order map into subnodes order? Otherwise,  
> how would things like layout or list work predictably?

Good point.  Since the API spec is the documentation, perhaps the  
documentation should state that.

[...]

>> Do you need a more complex structure to test the difference  
>> between normal and immediate?  They seem to have the same result.
>>
> I'm happy to take suggestions. The description of this initstage  
> doesn't distinguish itself enough for me, so I'm not clear what the  
> difference should be.

I hope Adam will clarify :)