[Laszlo-dev] Re: Ant 1.6.1

[Mika Göckel]

You can use

ant -listener org.apache.tools.ant.XmlLogger build

to get a log.xml with timing information like

<build time="4 minutes 18 seconds">
    ...
    <target name="build" time="4 minutes 17 seconds">
       ...
       <task location="C:\workspaces\appfuse\lps-dev\build.xml:475: " 
name="ant" time="59 seconds">

this is a quick way to get a hint how it changes....

Scott Evans schrieb:

>I just tried building the server with both:
>
>WEB-INF\lps\server build:
>  javac (1.4.2_08): 37 seconds
>  jikes (1.18): 33 seconds
>
>Obviously it's not making a big difference in build time to use javac.
>Are there platform benchmarks that we can use to determine if script 
>compiler performance has gotten notably worse?  Does that matter in 
>the face of the java rewrite?
>
>(always happy to nuke one more dependency in the build stuff, if we can)
>
>
>gse
>
>
>
>On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Oliver Steele wrote:
>
>  
>
>>On Nov 22, 2005, at 1:55 PM, P T Withington wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>FWIW, I just use the standard jikes that comes with OS X.
>>>      
>>>
>>Let's switch to the latest jikes, then, so that we can switch to the latest,
>>unpatched, ant.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>(I was always suspicious about a file named mac...exe :P)
>>>
>>>On 22 Nov 2005, at 13:40, Scott Evans wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>It's because the jikes that we include isn't called "jikes".
>>>>It's called one of:
>>>> macosx-jikes-1.18.exe
>>>> unix-jikes-1.18.exe
>>>> windows-jikes-1.18.exe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>gse
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Joseph Silverman wrote:
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>On Mac OS X there was a problem with the VERSION of jikes, I believe.
>>>>>There
>>>>>were other reasons we had to specify a full path - don't recall them all
>>>>>
>>>>>- Yossie
>>>>>
>>>>>On Nov 22, 2005, at 10:07 AM, Oliver Steele wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Nov 22, 2005, at 1:01 PM, Scott Evans wrote:
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yah, build.compiler sets the compiler to be sued, but as far as I
>>>>>>>can tell
>>>>>>>from reading the ant source, there's no way to tell it where to find
>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>executable short of using that attribute.  And of course the ant
>>>>>>>docs are
>>>>>>>a little spotty on this.  Mika, ideas?  How did you deal with the
>>>>>>>jikes
>>>>>>>thing in your 1.6.x port?
>>>>>>>              
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Why is it necessary to specify a pathname for jikes, instead of using
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>one in the user's path?
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Laszlo-dev mailing list
>>>>Laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org
>>>>http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Laszlo-dev mailing list
>>>Laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org
>>>http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
>>>      
>>>
>_______________________________________________
>Laszlo-dev mailing list
>Laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org
>http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
>
>  
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://openlaszlo.org/pipermail/laszlo-dev/attachments/20051122/92cd6612/attachment.html