[Laszlo-dev] Re: Ant 1.6.1

[Oliver Steele]

On Nov 22, 2005, at 1:55 PM, P T Withington wrote:
> FWIW, I just use the standard jikes that comes with OS X.

Let's switch to the latest jikes, then, so that we can switch to the  
latest, unpatched, ant.

> (I was always suspicious about a file named mac...exe :P)
>
> On 22 Nov 2005, at 13:40, Scott Evans wrote:
>
>> It's because the jikes that we include isn't called "jikes".
>> It's called one of:
>>   macosx-jikes-1.18.exe
>>   unix-jikes-1.18.exe
>>   windows-jikes-1.18.exe
>>
>>
>> gse
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Joseph Silverman wrote:
>>> On Mac OS X there was a problem with the VERSION of jikes, I  
>>> believe.  There
>>> were other reasons we had to specify a full path - don't recall  
>>> them all
>>>
>>> - Yossie
>>>
>>> On Nov 22, 2005, at 10:07 AM, Oliver Steele wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Nov 22, 2005, at 1:01 PM, Scott Evans wrote:
>>>>> Yah, build.compiler sets the compiler to be sued, but as far as  
>>>>> I can tell
>>>>> from reading the ant source, there's no way to tell it where to  
>>>>> find the
>>>>> executable short of using that attribute.  And of course the  
>>>>> ant docs are
>>>>> a little spotty on this.  Mika, ideas?  How did you deal with  
>>>>> the jikes
>>>>> thing in your 1.6.x port?
>>>>
>>>> Why is it necessary to specify a pathname for jikes, instead of  
>>>> using the
>>>> one in the user's path?
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Laszlo-dev mailing list
>> Laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org
>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Laszlo-dev mailing list
> Laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org
> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev