[Laszlo-dev] Re: Ant 1.6.1
P T Withington
ptw at pobox.com
Tue Nov 22 10:55:46 PST 2005
FWIW, I just use the standard jikes that comes with OS X.
(I was always suspicious about a file named mac...exe :P)
On 22 Nov 2005, at 13:40, Scott Evans wrote:
> It's because the jikes that we include isn't called "jikes".
> It's called one of:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Joseph Silverman wrote:
>> On Mac OS X there was a problem with the VERSION of jikes, I
>> believe. There
>> were other reasons we had to specify a full path - don't recall
>> them all
>> - Yossie
>> On Nov 22, 2005, at 10:07 AM, Oliver Steele wrote:
>>> On Nov 22, 2005, at 1:01 PM, Scott Evans wrote:
>>>> Yah, build.compiler sets the compiler to be sued, but as far as
>>>> I can tell
>>>> from reading the ant source, there's no way to tell it where to
>>>> find the
>>>> executable short of using that attribute. And of course the ant
>>>> docs are
>>>> a little spotty on this. Mika, ideas? How did you deal with
>>>> the jikes
>>>> thing in your 1.6.x port?
>>> Why is it necessary to specify a pathname for jikes, instead of
>>> using the
>>> one in the user's path?
> Laszlo-dev mailing list
> Laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org
More information about the Laszlo-dev