[Laszlo-dev] Re: Ant 1.6.1

[P T Withington]

FWIW, I just use the standard jikes that comes with OS X.

(I was always suspicious about a file named mac...exe :P)

On 22 Nov 2005, at 13:40, Scott Evans wrote:

> It's because the jikes that we include isn't called "jikes".
> It's called one of:
>   macosx-jikes-1.18.exe
>   unix-jikes-1.18.exe
>   windows-jikes-1.18.exe
>
>
> gse
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Joseph Silverman wrote:
>> On Mac OS X there was a problem with the VERSION of jikes, I  
>> believe.  There
>> were other reasons we had to specify a full path - don't recall  
>> them all
>>
>> - Yossie
>>
>> On Nov 22, 2005, at 10:07 AM, Oliver Steele wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 22, 2005, at 1:01 PM, Scott Evans wrote:
>>>> Yah, build.compiler sets the compiler to be sued, but as far as  
>>>> I can tell
>>>> from reading the ant source, there's no way to tell it where to  
>>>> find the
>>>> executable short of using that attribute.  And of course the ant  
>>>> docs are
>>>> a little spotty on this.  Mika, ideas?  How did you deal with  
>>>> the jikes
>>>> thing in your 1.6.x port?
>>>
>>> Why is it necessary to specify a pathname for jikes, instead of  
>>> using the
>>> one in the user's path?
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Laszlo-dev mailing list
> Laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org
> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev