[Laszlo-dev] Re: Ant 1.6.1
gse at laszlosystems.com
Tue Nov 22 10:40:09 PST 2005
It's because the jikes that we include isn't called "jikes".
It's called one of:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Joseph Silverman wrote:
> On Mac OS X there was a problem with the VERSION of jikes, I believe. There
> were other reasons we had to specify a full path - don't recall them all
> - Yossie
> On Nov 22, 2005, at 10:07 AM, Oliver Steele wrote:
> > On Nov 22, 2005, at 1:01 PM, Scott Evans wrote:
> > > Yah, build.compiler sets the compiler to be sued, but as far as I can tell
> > > from reading the ant source, there's no way to tell it where to find the
> > > executable short of using that attribute. And of course the ant docs are
> > > a little spotty on this. Mika, ideas? How did you deal with the jikes
> > > thing in your 1.6.x port?
> > Why is it necessary to specify a pathname for jikes, instead of using the
> > one in the user's path?
More information about the Laszlo-dev