[Laszlo-dev] Re: Ant 1.6.1
Joseph Silverman
yossie at laszlosystems.com
Tue Nov 22 10:20:45 PST 2005
On Mac OS X there was a problem with the VERSION of jikes, I
believe. There were other reasons we had to specify a full path -
don't recall them all
- Yossie
On Nov 22, 2005, at 10:07 AM, Oliver Steele wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2005, at 1:01 PM, Scott Evans wrote:
>> Yah, build.compiler sets the compiler to be sued, but as far as I
>> can tell
>> from reading the ant source, there's no way to tell it where to
>> find the
>> executable short of using that attribute. And of course the ant
>> docs are
>> a little spotty on this. Mika, ideas? How did you deal with the
>> jikes
>> thing in your 1.6.x port?
>
> Why is it necessary to specify a pathname for jikes, instead of
> using the one in the user's path?
More information about the Laszlo-dev
mailing list